March 27, 2015
“You can’t find what you’re not looking for.”
In the final post of this series, let’s take a “holistic” look at how Washington’s elected officials are proposing to address the e-cigarette question both from a tax and a health standpoint.
Quoting again from the Auburn Reporter article …
Rep. Chris Reykdal, D-Tumwater, agrees there is significant need to address vapor-product regulation from a health standpoint. However, Reykdal said making the school systems more dependent on vapor products as a tax source is not wise public policy.
- Who would benefit from this tax?
- The bill would bankrupt virtually all small vaping products businesses and eliminate online sales. That would leave only two sources:
- Contraband illegally smuggled into the state and
- Big Tobacco.
- The bill’s 95% tax will eliminate the cost incentive for switching from cigarettes to vaping products. Potential e-cigarette users will continue to smoke cigarettes. Current e-cigarette users will go back to smoking cigarettes. Who wins? Big Tobacco.
- Who will continue marketing inferior e-cigarette products? Big Tobacco.
- Why? Because 95% of their sales come from combustible cigarettes. Net profits from sales last year – $37 billion. Who wins? Big Tobacco.
- In the absence of any competition and with school systems “more dependent on vapor products as a tax source”, who will they be dependent on? Big Tobacco.
“I’m not ruling out the tax side,” Reykdal said. “I just want a better more rational conversation with all the parties on what is the best way to meet the health outcome and still have a rational tax policy.”
- A more rational conversation that actually focuses on meeting a “health outcome” would include ideas like:
- Tobacco harm reduction
- Evidence based studies
- Science instead of ideology
- Much is unknown about the health effects of long term use of e-cigarettes. What is known is there is a considerable volume of well documented science concluding that electronic cigarettes are dramatically less harmful than combustible tobacco cigarettes. The following is just a small sample. You be the judge.
Paul Davis, program manager for tobacco prevention and control at the Washington Department of Health: “If everybody quit smoking and went to e-cigarettes, and we didn’t have new kids starting, it’s pretty hard to argue that wouldn’t be a public-health benefit,” Davis said. “But we know we got a lot of kids starting and we’re not sure if people are completely quitting smoking and trading to these new vapor products.”
- So if 10%, 20% or 50% of current smokers quit smoking that would not be a public health benefit? Anything less than “everybody” would be a failure?
- “We know we have a lot of kids starting” implies starting to use e-cigarettes on a regular basis. All federally funded studies define “use” as one or two puffs within the last 30 days. All we know is that we have a lot of kids “experimenting” – big difference.
- The results of the 2014 Monitoring the Future study was released in December of last year.
- The study is conducted by the University of Michigan but federally funded by the National Institutes of Health.
- The study surveyed 45,000 students in approximately 400 schools nationwide.
- The survey found, for the first time ever, e-cigarette use by 8th, 10th and 12th grade students exceeded their use of tobacco cigarettes.
- The study also found that overall teen use of tobacco cigarettes was the lowest ever recorded in the 40 year history of the MTF survey.
- In addition, MTF determined that cigarette use by 12th grade students went from 16.3% in 2013 to 13.6% in 2014 – the largest single year decline in MTF history.
- Could there be a connection? As youth e-cigarette use goes up, smoking goes down. Not just declining, but dropping at rates never seen before. A public health benefit with no historical equal.
“Rational tax policy”? “Best way to meet the health outcome”?
You be the judge.
We are sincerely interested in your thoughts and comments! Please join the conversation and invite others by sharing this post! Thank you for visiting our site and we hope that you will come back often!
Dave Coggin has a Master’s Degree in business and spent 35 years in corporate America. He is a co-founder and partner in DIYELS. He has spent the last five years actively researching and following the evolution of the e-cigarette industry. He is a strong proponent of e-cigarettes as the most promising option currently known for tobacco harm reduction. He may be contacted directly at firstname.lastname@example.org .
The opinions presented here are exclusively those of the author. Vaper’s Vortex is offered as a service to our customers and followers. Anyone considering e-cigarettes as an alternative to tobacco cigarettes should seek qualified advice from a medical professional.